<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pornography and Pop Culture &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/</link>
	<description>surf&#039;s up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mm</title>
		<link>http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>hi, i am a feminist who chooses not to use &quot;2nd wave&quot; or &quot;3rd wave&quot; as I believe it encourages a chasm between different groups of women over just a few issues - which tend to be porn and sex work! I don&#039;t have time for an epic response to this, but I feel that a lot of the fighting between these &quot;waves&quot; leaves no space for layered opinions on the issues. Either you are opposed to all porn everywhere, or you can&#039;t get enough of &quot;Girls Gone Wild.&quot;

I have no time for a male-run industry in which plastic-ed women work for pennies in cock-centric porn. But to be anti-porn means also denouncing the female-run, queer porn industry which, though small, has potential to educate and yes stimulate women. This porn industry demonstrates safe sex, educating where school sex ed programs DEFINITELY lack.

Can&#039;t we be against exploitative porn rather than blanket hating the whole concept of film and photography for sexual pleasure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, i am a feminist who chooses not to use &#8220;2nd wave&#8221; or &#8220;3rd wave&#8221; as I believe it encourages a chasm between different groups of women over just a few issues &#8211; which tend to be porn and sex work! I don&#8217;t have time for an epic response to this, but I feel that a lot of the fighting between these &#8220;waves&#8221; leaves no space for layered opinions on the issues. Either you are opposed to all porn everywhere, or you can&#8217;t get enough of &#8220;Girls Gone Wild.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have no time for a male-run industry in which plastic-ed women work for pennies in cock-centric porn. But to be anti-porn means also denouncing the female-run, queer porn industry which, though small, has potential to educate and yes stimulate women. This porn industry demonstrates safe sex, educating where school sex ed programs DEFINITELY lack.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t we be against exploitative porn rather than blanket hating the whole concept of film and photography for sexual pleasure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenconsciousness</title>
		<link>http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenconsciousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Can you provide the name of the paper you  are writing about or a link to it on-line? Whisnant’s paper ?  You have provided a big service to women with this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide the name of the paper you  are writing about or a link to it on-line? Whisnant’s paper ?  You have provided a big service to women with this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceceliahouse</title>
		<link>http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>ceceliahouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Valenti&#039;s cover shouldn&#039;t be too surprising, given that on the feministing bio page she lists the movie, &lt;a href=&quot;http://imdb.com/title/tt0274812/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Secretary&lt;/a&gt;, as one of her favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valenti&#8217;s cover shouldn&#8217;t be too surprising, given that on the feministing bio page she lists the movie, <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0274812/" rel="nofollow">The Secretary</a>, as one of her favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kara</title>
		<link>http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceceliahouse.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/pornography-and-pop-culture-part-1/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>yeah - valenti&#039;s cover threw me for a loop as well.  it seems that there is a huge push in the 3rd wavers to embrace a level of stockholm syndrome when it comes to porn.  i hear a lot about &quot;women taking the power of porn back (?!).&quot;  uh.  when did women ever have the &quot;power&quot; to begin with?  you can&#039;t reclaim something that wasn&#039;t there in the first place.

it seems to me that by money being involved at all would make anything less liberating - at the very least, it&#039;s a false sense of liberation.  does that make sense?  girls gone wild videos = liberation?  i don&#039;t see it.

i have to run right now - i need to think about this some more...  i&#039;ll be back!  thanks for writing all of this out -  next best thing to being there with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah &#8211; valenti&#8217;s cover threw me for a loop as well.  it seems that there is a huge push in the 3rd wavers to embrace a level of stockholm syndrome when it comes to porn.  i hear a lot about &#8220;women taking the power of porn back (?!).&#8221;  uh.  when did women ever have the &#8220;power&#8221; to begin with?  you can&#8217;t reclaim something that wasn&#8217;t there in the first place.</p>
<p>it seems to me that by money being involved at all would make anything less liberating &#8211; at the very least, it&#8217;s a false sense of liberation.  does that make sense?  girls gone wild videos = liberation?  i don&#8217;t see it.</p>
<p>i have to run right now &#8211; i need to think about this some more&#8230;  i&#8217;ll be back!  thanks for writing all of this out &#8211;  next best thing to being there with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
